Legal Opinion

Hulsinger v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1996No. A96A0631PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Chester Hulsinger appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the results of an Intoximeter test on the ground that the arresting officer failed to provide an independent blood test under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3). For reasons which follow, we affirm.

At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the arresting officer testified that after Hulsinger’s arrest and agreement to undergo a breath test at the police station, he stated that he wanted a blood test. The officer then furnished Hulsinger a telephone and telephone book and assisted him in finding the telephone number…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. State v. ButtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Koontz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Whittle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Ritter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API