Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 16, 2003No. A03A0946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

On July 9, 2002, the State charged Don Cole with driving under the influence of alcohol. Cole subsequently moved to suppress the results of his intoximeter test, arguing that the arresting officer failed to provide an independent blood test under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3) and that the arresting officer failed to use reasonable efforts to ensure that Cole’s blood was both drawn and tested. The trial court denied Cole’s motion, and we granted Cole’s application for interlocutory appeal. For reasons that follow, we reverse.

In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. State v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. State v. ButtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Moody v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hulsinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patricia S. Reed, Comm. W. Va. Dept. of Motor Vehicles v. Dustin HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. McGinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Koontz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Ritter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Sheehan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API