Koontz v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
Jeffrey E. Koontz appeals following his conviction and sentence for driving without a license and driving under the influence of alcohol. He contends the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion to suppress the breath test results on the ground that the officer failed to accommodate his request for an independent test of his blood.
On appeal of a decision on a motion to suppress, “we construe the evidence in favor of the trial court’s ruling, and the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo review. [Cit.]” Taylor v. State, 263 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- State v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- State v. ButtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- O'DELL v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Joel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patricia S. Reed, Comm. W. Va. Dept. of Motor Vehicles v. Dustin HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- State v. MetzagerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Whittle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.