Legal Opinion

Grant v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of defendant, in that while he was in the regular discharge of his duty as mail agent in one of the cars attached to and forming part of one of defendant's regular passenger and mail trains, in motion, the same was thrown violently from the track, and he sustained serious physical injuries.

The defendant denied the material allegations of the complaint, and the following issues were submitted to the jury:

1. Was the plaintiff damaged by the negligence of the defendant?

2. What damage, if any,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Hemphill v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Ellis v. Portsmouth & Roanoke Rail RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  4. Doggett v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Moore v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cheek v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Hygienic Plate Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GarvenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GarvenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Kimbrough v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API