Legal Opinion

Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Garven

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1908Published

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Goggin.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit for damages, arising from personal injuries, instituted by appellee. One of the grounds of negligence was that 'the engine was not equipped with a “fusible plug,” an appliance placed in the crown sheet of the boilers of locomotives “to the end that, should the water in the boiler, for any cause, get lower than the crown sheet, such fusible plug will melt, the water from the boiler will put out the fire, and the strain upon the boiler be relieved, and thereby any danger of an explosion averted; that an engine properly equipped with such fusible plug can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. McCray v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mallery v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Soderman v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API