Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Garven
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Goggin.
1Opinion of the Court
This is a suit for damages, arising from personal injuries, instituted by appellee. One of the grounds of negligence was that the engine was not equipped with a "fusible plug," an appliance placed in the crown sheet of the boilers of locomotives "to the end that, should the water in the boiler, for any cause, get lower than the crown sheet, such fusible plug will melt, the water from the boiler will put out the fire, and the strain upon the boiler be relieved, and thereby any danger of an explosion averted; that an engine properly equipped with such fusible plug can not explode." Another…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McCray v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Broadway v. San Antonio Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Mallery v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Lancaster v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910