Legal Opinion

Gainey v. Rockingham Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValentine, J.

This appeal challenges tbe correctness of tbe court’s action in overruling defendant’s demurrer to tbe evidence and motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

Plaintiffs’ evidence was abundantly sufficient to raise tbe reasonable inference that defendant bad negligently allowed combustible material to gather and remain in large quantities on its right of way near its track in tbe vicinity of plaintiffs’ property and that this inflammable material was ignited by sparks, coals and embers emitted from defendant’s engine. This evidence makes out a case for tbe plaintiffs and was correctly submitted to tbe…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Williams v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Knott v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Henderson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Simpson v. Enfield Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bivins v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Fleming v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Mills v. WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Lauing v. Rapid City, Pierre and Eastern Railroad, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API