Legal Opinion

Mills v. Waters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1952No. 388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValeNTINe, J.

It was a cold night in December and perfectly natural that the building should be heated in some manner. "With the gas tanks and pumps a safe distance from the front door, the presence of an open gas heater well within the room could not be regarded as negligence per se. The decisions of this Court are to the effect that in order to establish actionable negligence it must appear: (1) that the defendant, either personally or through an agent, servant or employee, has failed to exercise proper care and diligence in the performance of some legal duty which he owed the plaintiff under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Small v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Norris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Jernigan v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Money v. . Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Williamson v. ClaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API