Legal Opinion

State v. Hinnenkamp

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 5, 2019No. 119125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

*1106 Teresa Gayle Hinnenkamp appeals the district court's order that she submit to random drug and alcohol testing as a condition of her probation for her conviction of aggravated escape from custody. She claims that K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-6607(c)(6), which requires district courts to impose random drug and alcohol testing as a condition of probation, violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we reject Hinnenkamp's claims and affirm the district court's judgment.

On October…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API