State v. Hinnenkamp
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone, J.:
*1106 Teresa Gayle Hinnenkamp appeals the district court's order that she submit to random drug and alcohol testing as a condition of her probation for her conviction of aggravated escape from custody. She claims that K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-6607(c)(6), which requires district courts to impose random drug and alcohol testing as a condition of probation, violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we reject Hinnenkamp's claims and affirm the district court's judgment.
On October…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021