Legal Opinion

State v. Strong

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 10, 2021No. 121865Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 121,865 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHAMEKE CAESAR STRONG, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-5705(e) does not instruct the jury it must infer the defendant intended to distribute a drug if the defendant possessed a certain amount. The State retains its burden of persuasion. Instead, the provision creates a permissive inference telling the jury it may infer intent to distribute if the State proves the defendant possessed the requisite weight of the drug. 2. K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-5705(e) does not violate the Due Process…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API