Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Dewayne Clark; and Garr Keith Hardin v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky et al.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 5, 2026No. 3:17-cv-00419Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00419-GNS-CHL JEFFREY DEWAYNE CLARK; and GARR KEITH HARDIN PLAINTIFFS v. LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, KENTUCKY et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions in Limine (DN 488, 492, 496, 497, 499) and Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (DN 432, 436, 437, 438). The motions are ripe for adjudication. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW “A motion in limine is ‘any motion, whether made before or during trial, to exclude anticipated prejudicial…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.