Legal Opinion

Barstad v. Mid States Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 8, 2025No. 3:22-cv-08235Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jeanne Barstad, No. CV-22-08235-PCT-JZB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Mid States Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 56.) 16 For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motion. 17 I. Summary. 18 A nurse brought this civil action under the Rehabilitation Act against a skilled 19 nursing and rehabilitation center alleging she was illegally terminated because of her 20 disability. To state a cognizable claim, she must…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API