Legal Opinion

Willis v. Willis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1905No. 20,500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (13,476) ; Henry Olay Allen, J udge. Habeas Corpus by Hattie Belle Willis against Hathaniel Barker Willis and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee, Hattie B. Willis, petitioned the lower court to issue a writ of habeas corpus against appel*326lants for tlie purpose of securing tlie possession or custody of her infant daughter. The writ was accordingly issued. Appellant Nathaniel P. Willis appeared in court, and filed a separate motion to quash the writ, on the grounds: (1) That the petition did not show or allege that the infant child therein mentioned was unlawfully or illegally restrained of its liberty; (2) that it did not show a sufficient reason to entitle the petitioner to the custody of said child; (3) that it did not show…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Berkshire v. CaleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Schleuter v. CanatsyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Smith v. BordenIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Bullock v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Witte v. Dowd, WardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Willis v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Jensen v. SevyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Watts v. WattsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Witte v. Dowd, WardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API