Legal Opinion
Witte v. Dowd, Warden
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1951No. 28,718PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEmmert, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order of the trial court sustaining a motion to quash a writ of habeas corpus.
The complaint for the writ disclosed the following proceedings and judgment had in the Superior Court of LaPorte County on the 28th day of September, 1936, to-wit:
“Comes now the State of Indiana, by Clarence T. Sweeney, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, and comes also the defendant in his own proper person, and being present in open court, and being arraigned and being required to say how he will acquit himself of the charge made against him in the affidavit filed herein,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ex Parte YergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Carter v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Shoemaker v. Dowd, WardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- In re Derrico G.Illinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Hathaway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Shutt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Dowd, Warden v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.