Legal Opinion

Meachum v. Outdoor World Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Goldstein, J.

The action raises a novel issue, of apparent first impression in this State, relating to the impact upon class action certification of the relationship between the purported class representatives and counsel and alleged unethical conduct by each, which may have impinged upon the integrity of defendants’ right to counsel and attorney-client privilege. The issue is raised in the context of plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification, pursuant to CPLR article 9.

FACTS

The action was brought by three New York families, who had entered into retail…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Loschiavo v. Port Auth. of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Brandon v. ChefetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Katz v. NVF Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Tanzer v. Turbodyne Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carnegie v. H&R Block, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fiala v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Brissenden v. Time Warner CableNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Fair Housing Council of Central California, Inc. v. Tylar Property Management Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  5. Hernandez v. BalakianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API