Legal Opinion
Brissenden v. Time Warner Cable
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
Plaintiff Kimberly Brissenden brings this proposed class action lawsuit on behalf of herself and other subscribers to basic-only cable television offered by Time Warner Cable of New York City, a division of Time Warner Cable Inc. Plaintiff alleges that Time Warner is engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices in violation of section 349 of the General Business Law, because it is charging its basic cable customers for converter boxes, which they do not need, because the customers subscribe only to channels that are not being converted, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Broder v. Cablevision Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaccariello v. XM Satellite Radio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019