Legal Opinion

Bourne v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1995No. 98820, (Calendar No. 17)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether personal injury inflicted during the theft of a vehicle arises out of the use of that vehicle as a motor vehicle. Specifically, we must decide whether plaintiff’s injuries to his face and ankle from the assailant’s blow were the type of injuries that arise out of the normal use of a vehicle. Because this injury was a physical attack inflicted on plaintiff, we conclude that it did not arise out of the use of the vehicle as a motor vehicle.

With regard to the matter of attorney fees, we find that there has been enough controversy over the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. HigginbothamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Shinabarger v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Marzonie v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Putkamer v. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McKenzie v. Auto Club Insurance Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Scott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API