Legal Opinion

Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Will Hegar and Loree Hegar

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 7, 2013No. 01-10-00350-CVPublished

1Opinion

DISSENTING OPINION ON REHEARING

2DissentJustice Sharp

For all of the following reasons, I respectfully dissent.1

“This is not an accommodation doctrine case.”

The majority attempts to resolve this case based upon the common law accommodation doctrine, which it holds applies to this case — a point which even the He-gars dispute.

Under Texas law, the dominant mineral estate has the right to reasonable use of the surface estate to produce minerals, but this right is to be exercised with due regard for the rights of the surface estate’s owner. Getty Oil Co. v. Jones, 470 S.W.2d 618, 621 (Tex.1971). This concept of “due *337reg…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One v. Haupt, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Landreth v. Melendez, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  4. Valence Operating Co. v. Texas Genco, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API