Newbury v. McCammant
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINGS, Justice.
By declaratory judgment action, Kenneth W. Newbury, executor of the estate of Kate E. Fults, deceased, seeks a construction of Articles VI and VII of decedent’s will, more particularly as to whether the Article VI bequest adeemed. Trial court held it did and the property involved passed as residue. Adversely affected defendants appeal. We reverse.
Plaintiff executor takes no part in these appellate proceedings. The contest here is solely between two groups of defendants. For brevity, Article VI devisees will be sometimes referred to as appellants, Article VII residuary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Baker's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- In Re Bierstedt's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Wollgast v. HenningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Inghram v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- In Re Estate of SpragueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Estate of MiguetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Bates v. Fuller, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
- Douglas v. NewellWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of Estate of WolffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.