Legal Opinion

United States v. Safavian

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 21, 2009No. Criminal 05-0370 (PLF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant David Safavian’s motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and his motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33. The Court heard oral argument on these motions on April 20, 2009. Upon consideration of the motions papers, oppositions, replies, supplemental filings, oral arguments of counsel, and the entire record in this case, the Court concludes that the defendant’s motions should be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

From May 16, 2002 until January 2004, David…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. David SafavianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. SitzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Brooke v. Cooper House LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API