Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Mills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 24, 1952No. 1 Div. 469PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Bill by appellees, Mills, to cancel their note and mortgage given on a lot in Mobile, Alabama, and for other relief.

The payee of these instruments had, prior to their maturity, transferred and delivered them to appellants, who claimed to be holders in due course.

On the evidence presented it was satisfactorily shown that there was a failure of consideration of the instruments, which would have entitled the appellees to rescind the transaction incident to their execution and to have them cancelled as against the original holder. So the real question is whether tthe appellants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haug v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Brown v. IsbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Doll v. HollenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bishop v. ChaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Huston v. RoosaIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Wilkins v. RELIANCE EQUIPMENT CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Adams v. Madison Realty & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API