Legal Opinion
Pri-Har v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 2000No. 93 CR. 278(JES). No. 96 Civ. 9577(JES)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Rule 33”) and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“ § 2255”), petitioner moves to vacate his conviction or, alternatively, for an order granting a new trial based upon newly-discovered evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and ineffective assistance of counsel. In addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455(a) and 455(b)(1), petitioner moves for this Court to recuse itself from determination of his § 2255 motion on the grounds that this Court has a personal prejudice against him or, absent actual…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Becnel v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Pri-HarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Aftern Sanderson v. Leg Apparel LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Antolini v. McCloskeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.