Legal Opinion

Antolini v. McCloskey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 6, 2021No. 1:19-cv-09038Unknown

1Opinion

USIPL SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCH DATE FILED: □ 10/6/2021 Dino Antolini, Plaintiff, 1:19-cv-09038 (GBD) (SDA) -against- OPINION AND ORDER Amy McCloskey, et al., Defendants. STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Pending before the Court is a motion for recusal filed on behalf of Plaintiff Dino Antolini (“Plaintiff’ or “Antolini”). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND I. Early Procedural History Plaintiff commenced this action on September 28, 2019, asserting claims under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Carol BaylessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API