Legal Opinion
Vukasin v. D.A. Davidson & Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1990No. 89-424PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
This is an appeal from an order by the District Court, Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, Montana, denying a motion to stay proceedings in District Court. We reverse.
The controlling issue is the enforceability of an arbitration clause between D.A. Davidson and its employee.
Ms. Vukasin began working for D.A. Davidson (Davidson) on August 21, 1979. In 1985 Davidson began implementing annual performance reviews which were completed in May of each year. Ms. Vukasin signed these performance reviews in May of 1985,1986, and 1987. In the years 1986 and 1987, Ms. Vukasin also received a bonus…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Casarotto v. LombardiMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Chor v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Solle v. Western States Insurance Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
- Downey v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.