Legal Opinion

Woody v. Tamer

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1987No. Docket 86005PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s order of summary disposition entered June 12, 1985, on their claims for tortious interference with contractual relations or prospective business relationships and conspiracy to injure plaintiffs in their business relations. We reverse the decision of the trial court and remand for further proceedings on plaintiffs’ claims.

Defendants’ motion for summary disposition was brought under MCR 2.116(C)(8), failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We review a trial court’s order of summary disposition under that subrule by a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schipani v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Dzierwa v. Michigan Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. NORTHERN PLBG. & HEATING, INC. v. Henderson Bros., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Dassance v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bonelli v. Volkswagen of America, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Jim-Bob, Inc v. MehlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Formall, Inc. v. Community National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Feaheny v. CaldwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API