Legal Opinion

Eliason v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 3, 1963No. [No. 278, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

1’n a mandamus action by a citizen against the State Roads Commission and the Commissioner of Personnel of Maryland to require them to file written charges against three employees of the Commission, seeking their discharge under the Merit System law, the trial court directed a verdict for the respondents, denied the writ and entered judgment for the respondents for costs. The citizen has appealed, claiming that the administrative determinations not to allow charges to be filed were invalid because they were arbitrary, and unconstitutional because they were reached without affording him the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Hintenberger v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hyson v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. City of Bowie v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Eliason v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API