Legal Opinion
Paull v. Pierce
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 N.J. Super. 521 (1961)
172 A.2d 721
PETER N. PAULL, JULIUS KAUNACKI AND WILLIAM TROUTMAN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ALFRED R. PIERCE, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, JOSEPH HOOVEN, HOWARD CLAYTON, VINCENT CONLEY, SAMUEL SAUNDERS, ROLAND COMERFORD, WILLIAM KELLY, EDWARD WATSON, WILLIAM H. NEALE, JOHN W. WATKINS, WILLIAM YEAGER, STANEY ZUCHOWICZ, AND GEORGE WEBER, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided June 30, 1961.
Mr. Salvatore J. Avena argued the cause for plaintiffs.
Mr. Louis L. Goldman argued the cause for defendant, Alfred R. Pierce, Mayor of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- San-Lan Builders, Inc. v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FousekMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Concini v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Clapp v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gelch v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Golaine v. CardinaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- State ex rel. Flex v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BullockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Hayes v. Hudson County Bd. of FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.