Legal Opinion

Stull v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1905No. 3074PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five -years; hence this appeal.

Appellant reserved a number of bills of exception to the action of the court permitting the district attorney to ask witnesses the following question: After said witness had testified as to the general reputation of defendant for honesty and truth, and veracity, and that it was good, then the State was permitted to ask said witness, “Don’t you know that defendant "has been charged with and indicted for subornation of perjury, and that in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poyner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Crockett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Winn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Land v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. McCleary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API