Legal Opinion

People v. Linden

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1962No. Crim. 3974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Appellant and one O ’Shinn, cellmates in San Quentin prison, were convicted of oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a). This was a retrial, a previous jury having failed to reach a verdict. Only Linden appeals. Appellant was represented at trial by the public defender. We appointed counsel for him here. That attorney reported that he had reviewed the record and found no merit in the appeal. He was relieved of his assignment, and we refused appellant’s request for the appointment of other counsel (People v. Tabb, 156 Cal.App.2d 467, 471-472 [319 P.2d 656]; and see People v. Brown, 55 Cal.2d 64, 74…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In re FinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. CasselmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re NashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API