In Re Nash
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
A jury found petitioner guilty of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. 3), and the trial court denied his motion for a new trial and sentenced him to prison. He appealed and requested that the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District appoint counsel to represent him. That court appointed counsel who studied the record, consulted with petitioner, and interviewed petitioner’s trial counsel and the trial court clerk and reporter. He then wrote to the appellate court and to petitioner stating that in his opinion there were no meritorious grounds of appeal. The appellate court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.