Legal Opinion
Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. Mueller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1925No. 14611PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
This action was commenced in the district court, of Okmulgee county, Okla., by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, as defendants, to recover the sum of $388.60 alleged to be due for auto tire accessories furnished by the. plaintiff to- the defendants upon a written contract.
Upon trial of the case to a jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendants, upon which the court rendered judgment, and from which the plaintiff has appealed.
The evidence in the case is substantially as follows: That an agent of the plaintiff company, which was engaged in making…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, ConnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Miller Bros. v. McCall Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Garrison v. KressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Barnhart v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Barrows v. AlfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Allan v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Dickson v. JoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.