Legal Opinion

Ursaner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the specific terms of the insurance policy, the double indemnity which is here alone in question, was payable only on proof of the insured’s death as the result of bodily injuries through accidental means independently of all other causes and “ that death shall not have been the result of * * * or contributed to, directly or indirectly, or wholly, or partially, by disease, or by bodily * * * infirmity # * *

The court charged, without exception or objection by plaintiff, that the burden of proof was on plaintiff and further charged that before plaintiff could recover the jury “ must find…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Beglin v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Gittelson v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Ursaner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wolfson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tinney v. Neilson's Flowers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fieldston Garden Apartments, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hoyt v. John Hancock Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Otto Gerdau Co. v. Bowne-Morton's Stores, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Caporino v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API