Legal Opinion
Fieldston Garden Apartments, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.
In this action for declaratory judgment and injunction, the defendants move to dismiss the complaint under rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The action was instituted by the plaintiff to declare illegal and unconstitutional an amendment to the zoning law of the City of New York known as CP 10780, unanimously adopted by the City Planning Commission on June 2, 1954, and unanimously approved by the Board of Estimate on June 11, 1954. The injunction seeks to restrain the acting borough superintendent of the Borough of The Bronx from issuing a permit to erect any building under the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matula v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Nieskes & Craig, Inc. v. SchoonermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Baker v. Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmond County Circuit Court · 1975