Legal Opinion

Tinney v. Neilson's Flowers, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

This motion for a new trial, made pursuant to CPLR 4404 (subd. [a]) and 4405, is predicated upon three grounds. The reasons for the court’s rulings on two of the grounds were sufficiently stated on the record and will not be discussed further. The third ground is that it was error to allow into evidence that part of the Central Islip Hospital record dealing with alcoholism and tending to show that decedent was an alcoholic.

Since the moving papers do not include a stenographic transcript, what follows is based upon the court’s notes and recollection. The evidence in question was admitted on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Davis v. . Supreme Lodge, Knights of HonorNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Gt. W. Turnpike Co. v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Buffalo Loan, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woosley v. DunningOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. FappianoNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re the Estate of PostleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  4. Tinney v. Neilson's Flowers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API