Legal Opinion
Grice v. Todd
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 15, 1917PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
The facts in this case are agreed and are as follows:
“It is agreed that E. W. Grice was a tenant of Mrs. Mary V. Todd of the premises 509 W. Franklin street, Richmond, Virginia, under lease hereto attached, as part hereof, and held over for one year thereunder, which year expired August 31, 1914; that he gave three months’notice to her that he would vacate at said expiration of said year; that he held over for three days after August 31,1914, because, although he endeavored to obtain them, he could not get wagons to move his effects on August 31, 1914, to the apartment to which he wished to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haynes v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Herter v. . MullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Regan v. FosdickAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
- Mason v. Wierengo's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by16 opinions
- County of Campbell v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Hendrickson v. MeredithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Nehi Bottling Company, Incorporated v. All-American Bottling Corporation, John Armes v. All-American Bottling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Ellis & Meyers Lumber Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Southern Biscuit Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.