Herrin v. Scandinavian-American Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bonald, J., entered February 3, 1911, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
— On June 13, 1910, respondent Renkslev and the appellants had some negotiations with reference to the sale of twenty shares of United Wireless telegraph stock. The stock owned or controlled by appellants was in a single certificate calling for a greater number of shares. The segregation could only be made and new certificates issued at an eastern office of the Wireless Company. It was agreed that Renkslev would provide for the payment of the purchase price at the Scandinavian-American Bank where he had a general deposit. He accordingly executed the following memorandum:
“Scandinavian-American…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Andreas v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Victor Safe & Lock Co. v. O'NeilWashington Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Higgins v. EgbertWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Taylor v. EwingWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Brewster District Unit v. MonroeWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Lasswell v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.