Legal Opinion

Skinner v. City of Eustis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 2, 1941PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the court below, filed a declaration against City of Eustis claiming damages for an injury alleged to have resulted from negligence of the defendant in the operation of a “skeet” shooting range.

It is not necessary to elaborate on the alleged cause of action as will be seen as the question presented to us is developed.

The praecipe for summons was issued more than a year after the wrongful act and to the declaration the defendant filed certain pleas, among them one that the “cause of action did not accrue within six months before this suit.” It was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Brown v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Coolidge v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Town of Mount Dora v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Haven Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. KirianSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Caple v. Tuttle's Design-Build, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. Ide v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API