Legal Opinion

Ide v. City of St. Cloud

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 2, 1942PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

Final judgment is before us for review on writ of error. The lower court held plaintiff’s declaration insufficient and entered judgment for defendant.

The substance of the declaration was that defendant maintained a bathing beach outside the city limits; that for some time the city had knowingly allowed a deep hole out in the lake to remain hidden and unguarded; that the city had invited the general public on the premises and plaintiff’s husband and minor son entered in response to the invitation and were drowned by reason of the city’s negligence aforesaid.

The city has charter power…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Augustine v. Town of BrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. McKinney v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Skinner v. City of EustisSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Thayer v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Avallone v. Bd. of County Com'rs Citrus Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Des Isles v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. City of St. Petersburg, Etc., and Jack Puryear, as Director of the Bureau of Recreation of the City of St. Petersburg, Florida v. Fred AlsupCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Pickett v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API