Legal Opinion
George Hyman Construction Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 11, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-0550PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s request for damages and related re*899lief against defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). By this action plaintiff challenges WMATA’s General Manager’s “Final Decision” resolving a contract dispute between the parties. Currently pending are plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendants' cross motion for summary judgment. This memorandum addresses those motions.
I
The plaintiff, George Hyman Construction Company (“Hyman”), in 1974 contracted with WMATA for the “finish…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Capital Electric Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Alfred Morris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Beale v. King, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- George Hyman Construction Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority George Hyman Construction Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987