George Hyman Construction Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from a contractual dispute between the George Hyman Construction Co. (Hyman) and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMA-TA). Officials of WMATA issued a decision on the controversy pursuant to the contract’s “Disputes” clause. Hyman then brought suit in district court to challenge WMATA’s decision. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the court denied Hyman’s claim for “cost of capital,” but granted Hyman’s claim for “home office overhead costs.” 621 F.Supp. 898. Both parties appealed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alfred Morris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- District of Columbia v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Nello L. Teer Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Williams Enterprises, Inc. v. Strait Manufacturing & Welding, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- George Hyman Construction Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority George Hyman Construction Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- District of Columbia v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.