Legal Opinion

Aronberg v. Tolbert

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 29, 2011PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In this case, a mother brought a survival and wrongful death action on behalf of the estate of her son, an uninsured motorist who was killed by the alleged negligence of another driver. The other driver and his employer (defendants) claimed that the lawsuit was barred by N.J.S.A. 39:6A~4.5(a). That statute provides that any person who fails to maintain statutorily required no-fault insurance “shall have no cause of action for recovery of economic or noneconomic loss sustained as a result of an accident while operating an uninsured automobile.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a).

The trial court held that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Newburgh v. ArrigoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Devereux FoundationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. Brandon Morrison(076379)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. Robert B. Beim v. Trevor R. Hulfish (071025)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Debra Warren v. Christopher P. MuenzenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API