Legal Opinion

United States v. Flores

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 23, 2007No. 06-0675/MCPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge EFFRON

delivered the opinion of the Court. 1

At a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone, Appellant faced charges of conspiracy to commit larceny and six specifications of larceny. See Articles 81 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 921 (2000). Prior to entering pleas, Appellant filed a motion challenging the legality of a search that had produced significant evidence on the charged offenses. The military judge denied Appellant’s motion, ruling that Appellant lacked standing to challenge the legality of the search. Following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. ReisterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. LeedyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. RaderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  3. United States v. MacomberCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  4. United States v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API