Legal Opinion
Al De ARTEAGA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. PALL ULTRAFINE FILTRATION CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 15, 1988No. 88-1046PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the defendant, Pall Ultrafine Filtration Corporation (“Pall”), in an age discrimination action brought by Al De Arteaga, who was discharged at the age of 47 after serving for a year as Pali’s regional sales manager for Puerto Rico, Georgia and Florida. The district court’s opinion is published at 673 F.Supp. 650 (D.P.R.1987). Essentially for the reasons stated therein, we affirm. We comment further, however, upon certain of appellant’s arguments.
The question, when reviewing the correctness…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Eugene MENARD, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FIRST SECURITY SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- DeARTEAGA v. Pall Ultrafine Filtration Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987
3Cited by39 opinions
- Thomas B. Connell v. Bank of Boston and John S. IngallsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Andrew P. Hebert v. The Mohawk Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Dominguez v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
- Donald H. FRIEZE, Appellee, v BOATMEN’S BANK OF BELTON, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Michael A. Caputo v. Boston Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.