Legal Opinion

Michael A. Caputo v. Boston Edison Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 17, 1991No. 90-1684PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s granting of defendant Boston Edison’s summary judgment motions on the plaintiff’s claims for both negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff-appellant, Michael A. Caputo, has chosen to appeal only his intentional infliction claim.

I. BACKGROUND

Caputo claims to have been exposed to excessive radiation while working for approximately three months as a boilermaker/assistant foreman for an independent contractor at Boston Edison Company’s Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (“Pilgrim Station”) in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Norman W. OLIVER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,776 David Snow v. Harnischfeger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. G.D. Etc. v. Westmoreland School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Grant v. John Hancock Mutual, Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  4. Orell v. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  5. O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API