Legal Opinion
Means v. City of Dayton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 28, 2000No. C-3-98-058PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXPANDED OPINION SETTING FORTH REASONING AND CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF ORDER OF MARCH 24, 2000 (DOC. # 30) SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #19); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiff initiated • this litigation, claiming that Defendant City of Dayton (“Defendant”) violated the Fair Housing Act, as amended by the Fair Housing Act Amendments (“FHAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., and § 4112.02 of the Ohio Revised Code, by imposing conditions upon her operation of a residential care…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Overlook Mutual Homes, Inc. v. SpencerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Connecticut Hospital v. City of New LondonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.