Legal Opinion

Horton v. Maersk Line, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided September 9, 2013No. CV412-127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GEORGE R. SMITH, District Judge.

In this maritime personal injury case, defendant Maersk Line, Limited (Maersk) moves under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) for an order to: (1) prevent plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Brent Savage, from “re-abusing” a deposition witness; and (2) bar plaintiffs’ use here of a prior state-court deposition of that same witness, lest they profit from Savage’s misconduct during that deposition. Doc. 71.

I. BACKGROUND

John Horton, a longshoreman, sued the Georgia Ports Authority (GPA) in state court. He alleged that a GPA cargo-crane operator’s negligence partially caused injuries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Erik Redwood and Jude Redwood v. Elizabeth Dobson and Harvey Cato Welch, and Marvin Ira GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Coach, Inc. v. Hubert Keller, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Kimberly-Clark USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  2. Green v. Cosco Shipping Lines Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
  3. Marseet v. Rochester Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
  4. Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. Wendemu v. TesemaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API