Legal Opinion

Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1935No. 26737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The action was brought by the board of education of the city of Oklahoma City to require, by mandamus, certain action by the excise board of Oklahoma county. The board of education has appealed from certain rulings of the trial court, and the excise board has cross-appealed therefrom.

The school board first contends that the excise board acted arbitrarily and in excess of its authority in allocating to the Oklahoma City school district only 4.5 mill levy for general fund purposes; alleging that 5 mills should have been allowed.

The facts are that the excise board, by general order of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. MorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Board Ed. of Guthrie v. Excise Board of Logan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Webster v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Board of Educ.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Mangum v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Logan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Opinion No. (2001), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API