Legal Opinion

Whitehall Pharmacal Company v. Frances Denney

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 23, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6316Published

1Opinion of the Court

255 F.2d 693

WHITEHALL PHARMACAL COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

Frances DENNEY, Appellee.

Patent Appeal No. 6316.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 23, 1958.

Mortimer Altin, New York City, for appellant.

Mock & Blum, New York City (Asher Blum, New York City, and Charles R. Allen, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY and RICH, Judges.

RICH, Judge.

1

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents dismissing opposition No. 32,695.

2

Application serial No. 639,212 was filed December 9, 1952, by Frances Denney, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Sleepmaster Products Company, Inc. v. American Auto-Felt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Armour and Company v. Organon, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. F. Jacobson & Sons, Inc. v. Jaybern Fabrics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Whitehall Pharmacal Company v. Frances DenneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API