Armour and Company v. Organon, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal in an opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commis*496sioner of Patents, 106 U.S.P.Q. 220, speaking through the Assistant Commissioner, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences which sustained the opposition and which adjudged that applicant (appellee here) was not entitled to the registration sought. The Assistant Commissioner was of the opinion that opposer (appellant here) had not alleged facts in its notice of opposition from which likelihood of damage could be presumed and, accordingly, dismissed the opposition. From this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Selchow v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. United Conditioning Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Model Brassiere Co. v. Bromley-Shepard Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Intercontinental Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Continental Motors CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Abcor Development Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Otto Roth & Co. v. Universal Foods Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- King-Size, Inc. v. Frank's King Size Clothes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
- American Throwing Company, Inc. v. Famous Bathrobe Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. Pharmaton, S. A., D.B.A. Pharmaton A. G. And Pharmaton Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.