Legal Opinion
Town of Ruston v. Adams
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1928No. 3378PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay to the Town of Ruston $651.20 as his pro rata charge for the paving of South Line street, said paving having been done by the town under the provisions of Act 187 of 1920 and Act 115 of 1922.
The facts, as they appear in the record, are that in the month of April, 1926, certain property owners presented a petition to the City Council reciting that they owned more than sixty' per cent of the property fronting on South Line street, between Bonner and Vienna streets, in the said town, and asked that the town pave the same and that the work…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. WattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Bomar v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Clark v. City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- DeGrilleau v. FrawleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. GarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Guaranty Mortgage & Securities Co. v. MillsapsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Allen v. Village of SavageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- City of Alexandria v. ShevninSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- City of Natchitoches v. KileLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Regard v. EscudeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953